Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
American Journal of Transplantation ; 22(Supplement 3):674, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2063402

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Gout in kidney transplant (KT) recipients can be severe and particularly challenging to manage. Pegloticase co-therapy with immunomodulators improved urate lowering therapy (ULT) response rates over phase 3 monotherapy trials by reducing anti-drug antibodies.1,2 This open-label trial (PROTECT NCT04087720) examined pegloticase safety and efficacy in KT patients with uncontrolled gout. Method(s): KT recipients with uncontrolled gout (serum urate [SU]>=7 mg/dL, intolerance/ inefficacy to ULT and >=1 of the following: tophi, chronic gouty arthritis, >=2 flares in past year) and functioning KT graft (eGFR>=15 ml/min/l.73m2) on stable immunosuppressive (IS) therapy (KT>l year earlier) received pegloticase (8 mg every 2 weeks for 24 weeks). SU response during Month 6 (SU <6 mg/dL for >=80% of time) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) pain (most severe: 100) and Disability Index (HAQ-DI, max: 3) scores were evaluated. Patients discontinuing treatment before Month 6 were considered nonresponders. Patients discontinuing due to COVID-19 concerns were excluded from analysis if no data points were available in Month 6. Result(s): 20 patients enrolled (mean+/-SD;age: 53.9+/-10.9 years, 85% male, time since KT: 14.7+/-6.9 years, SU: 9.4+/-1.5 mg/dL, gout duration: 7.9+/-11.6 years;all on >=2 IS) and 14/20 completed treatment. 16/18 (88.9% [95% CI: 65.3, 98.6]) were SU responders vs 43.5% previously reported3 without immunomodulation. Substantial SU reductions during treatments were reported in 18/20 patients completing or discontinuing for non-SU monitoring rule reasons (pre-dose SU>6 mg/dL at 2 consecutive visits). No notable eGFR changes were observed up to 3 months follow-up. In patients completing treatment, HAQ-pain and HAQ-DI mean scores improved by 35.5+/-31.5 and 0.3+/-0.6, respectively, at Week 24 (n=13 and n=14). 7 serious adverse events, deemed unrelated to pegloticase, were reported in 5 patients. No anaphylaxis or infusion reaction events occurred. Conclusion(s): Pegloticase was safe and effective in treated KT patients with uncontrolled gout, achieving a higher durable response rate than in previously-reported patients not on IS therapy along with improved HAQ scores indicative of quality of life impact. These findings are consistent with other reports of immunomodulation with pegloticase.

2.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 80(SUPPL 1):840, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1358644

ABSTRACT

Background: The prevalence of gout is high in kidney transplant (KT) recipients (up to 13%), largely because of decreased kidney function and calcineurin inhibitor use.1 Residual chronic kidney disease (CKD) leading to decreased urate lowering therapy clearance and drug interactions make managing gout in KT recipients challenging. Studies show that successful treatment with pegloticase, a pegylated uricase, leads to marked reductions in serum uric acid (sUA)2 and a subsequent decrease in overall urate load and tophi burden.3 However, pegloticase use in solid organ transplant recipients has not been systematically studied or well-characterized in the literature.4,5 Objectives: To examine the safety and efficacy of pegloticase in KT recipients with uncontrolled gout. Methods: This ongoing multicenter, open-label, efficacy and safety study of pegloticase in KT recipients (NCT04087720) included patients with uncontrolled gout sUA ≥7 mg/dL, urate lowering therapy [ULT] contraindication/inefficacy, and with either visible tophi, chronic gouty arthritis, or ≥2 flares in past year, who were KT recipients (KT >1 year prior), had a functioning graft (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥15 ml/min/1.73m2), and were on a stable immunosuppressant regimen. Pegloticase (8 mg infusion) was administered biweekly for 24 weeks (12 infusions) followed by a safety visit 30 days after the last infusion and 3-month post-treatment follow up visit. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients who were serum uric acid responders during Month 6 (sUA <6 mg/dL for ≥80% of time). Change from baseline (CFB) at 24 weeks was also evaluated for sUA, renal function, and health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI, maximum = 3) and pain (maximum = 100). Results: Preliminary findings of this study included 15 patients (12 male, 53.5±11.0 years of age) with uncontrolled gout (6.2±6.0 years since diagnosis) who had received a donor kidney 15.1±6.6 years earlier. At the time of analysis, 5 patients had completed the 24-week treatment period and 8 remained on therapy (last visit sUA <0.1 mg/dL in 6 patients, 1 had sUA of 7.4 mg/dL, 1 only received first infusion), and 2 had discontinued treatment (sUA rise [n=1], COVID-19 concerns [n=1]). Of the 5 patients who completed 24 weeks of therapy, all met response criteria and sUA was below detection limits (CFB: -10.2±1.3 mg/dL, baseline [BL]: 10.2±1.3 mg/dL). Patients also had less pain (HAQ-pain CFB: -33.6±22.2, BL: 35.9±22.0;n=5) and disability (HAQ-DI CFB: -0.3±0.6, BL: 0.7±0.8;n=5) at 24 weeks compared to BL. eGFR remained stable during 24 week treatment (eGFR CFB: -0.2±6.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, BL: 40.9±14.4 ml/min/1.73 m2;n=5). Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio showed improvement at 24 weeks (CFB: -223±405 mg/g, BL: 664±870 mg/g;n=5). 80% of patients experienced an AE, and 4 SAEs (duodenal ulcer, cellulitis, dyspnea, skin bacterial infection) deemed unrelated to pegloticase were reported. AEs that occurred in >1 patient included gout flare, pyrexia, arthralgia, and nasal congestion. No anaphylaxis or infusion reactions occurred. Conclusion: Initial findings suggest that pegloticase therapy is effective at reducing sUA in most KT recipients while preserving renal function. Results suggest that in the setting of profound urate lowering with pegloticase in KT patients, eGFR remains stable and patients experience clinically beneficial reductions in pain and disability with an absence of unexpected safety findings.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL